MANY different items to choose from

Hack your OS, customize your GUI, announce great software, and configure, configure, configure...
Post Reply
software_dragon
Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 06/04/08, 6:24 pm

MANY different items to choose from

Post by software_dragon » 06/04/08, 6:34 pm

Taken From Their "About" Section: "AppZilla Inc is now one of the leading producers of windows-based utility software and services. The company specializes in software development tools and services....." ** They Have MANY different items to choose from...and in all categories...believe its all Freeware too..!!

Check It Out !!: WebSite

bob
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
Posts: 7565
Joined: 12/03/01, 12:00 am
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Post by bob » 06/04/08, 7:52 pm

thanks, we'll look
WYSIWTF

JohnT
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
Posts: 2486
Joined: 12/03/01, 12:00 am
Location: Vladivostok, Russia
Contact:

Post by JohnT » 06/04/08, 8:08 pm

System Requirements:
Windows 98/ME/NT4/2000/XP/2003.
.NET Framework Version 1.1.
Don't do .NET here!! 8)
"A man may be a fool and not know it, but not if he is married."

bob
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
Posts: 7565
Joined: 12/03/01, 12:00 am
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Post by bob » 06/05/08, 3:27 am

Why not, John?
WYSIWTF

JohnT
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
Posts: 2486
Joined: 12/03/01, 12:00 am
Location: Vladivostok, Russia
Contact:

Post by JohnT » 06/05/08, 10:07 am

I gotta be anti-something Bob!!! Actually I got bit on .NET once in its early days....once bitten twice shy and there's something about downloading a 1mb app and then downloading a 23mb add-on. If .NET is so god-awful great why are applications running on everything from version 1.1 to 3.5...should I install all versions to have my bases covered? :lol:
"A man may be a fool and not know it, but not if he is married."

RedRage
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
Posts: 1542
Joined: 12/04/01, 12:00 am

Post by RedRage » 06/05/08, 3:42 pm

JohnT wrote:I gotta be anti-something Bob!!! Actually I got bit on .NET once in its early days....once bitten twice shy and there's something about downloading a 1mb app and then downloading a 23mb add-on. If .NET is so god-awful great why are applications running on everything from version 1.1 to 3.5...should I install all versions to have my bases covered? :lol:
I second that notion. the only reason i do .net now is cause some version came with vista and sp1 upgraded it. on my old XP it still doesn't have .net.. i think

SOD
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
Posts: 5284
Joined: 12/06/01, 12:00 am
Location: here and there

Post by SOD » 06/05/08, 10:05 pm

So much for a unified platform. This was supposed to
help the dll conflict situation mainly for dbs. heh a good example is the world famous Crystal Reports uses calls to dlls that are version dependent not to mention arcane. Write a new db app and on your machine and it blows up
when confronted with C.R. or a similar situation. dll versioning is a bitch.
It is better to be here than there - SOD

JohnT
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
Posts: 2486
Joined: 12/03/01, 12:00 am
Location: Vladivostok, Russia
Contact:

Post by JohnT » 06/06/08, 12:15 am

RedRage wrote: I second that notion. the only reason i do .net now is cause some version came with vista and sp1 upgraded it. on my old XP it still doesn't have .net.. i think
MS has a link somewhere on there .NET pages about how to do a fast check, whether its installed and what version.
"A man may be a fool and not know it, but not if he is married."

bob
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
Posts: 7565
Joined: 12/03/01, 12:00 am
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Post by bob » 06/06/08, 2:27 am

Some of those apps are too good to leave out
WYSIWTF

SOD
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
Posts: 5284
Joined: 12/06/01, 12:00 am
Location: here and there

Post by SOD » 06/06/08, 8:38 am

What gets me is the overhead associated with .net.
it's huge, and MS has an option to hide the mem oberhead from the end user.
It is better to be here than there - SOD

JohnT
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
Posts: 2486
Joined: 12/03/01, 12:00 am
Location: Vladivostok, Russia
Contact:

Post by JohnT » 06/06/08, 7:33 pm

SOD wrote:What gets me is the overhead associated with .net.
it's huge, and MS has an option to hide the mem oberhead from the end user.
I had disremembered that one........they must also have an option to hide the users memory from the user. :lol:
"A man may be a fool and not know it, but not if he is married."

SOD
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
BIG GIANT HEAD I Get Free Beer
Posts: 5284
Joined: 12/06/01, 12:00 am
Location: here and there

Post by SOD » 06/06/08, 11:28 pm

@John LOL

It's something you can do when you compile the app.
It is better to be here than there - SOD

Post Reply